Indian Union Cabinet approves “One Nation, One Election” bill; opposition warns of federal erosion

The Indian Union Cabinet on Thursday passed the much-debated ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill, aimed at conducting simultaneous elections for the Lok Sabha and all state assemblies. This landmark decision marks a significant shift in India’s electoral framework, but it has drawn sharp criticism from the Opposition, which sees it as a threat to federalism and regional autonomy.

The bill is expected to be introduced in the ongoing winter session of Parliament, but BJP insiders suggest it will immediately be referred to a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) for further deliberations. Union Government sources have also indicated that the timeline for implementation remains undecided, with possibilities ranging from 2029 to 2034.

Following the news, the bill received wide criticism from opposition parties. Congress Lok Sabha member K. Suresh reiterated his party’s longstanding opposition to the move. “Our party has already cleared our stand from the beginning, our stand has not changed. We are opposing it. Entire opposition is opposing it,” he said. Congress MP Jairam Ramesh also emphasized the need for scrutiny. “The bill will be presented in the Parliament and we want it to be sent to the JPC. The INC’s stand was made clear last year itself by party president Mallikarjun Kharge when he sent a four-page letter to former President Ram Nath Kovind’s committee on One Nation, One Election.”

Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and DMK leader M.K. Stalin strongly condemned the legislation, calling it a “draconian” measure. “This impractical and anti-democratic move will erase regional voices, erode federalism, and disrupt governance. Rise up INDIA! Let us resist this attack on Indian Democracy with all our strength!” he wrote on X.

CPI(M) Rajya Sabha MP John Brittas voiced similar concerns, criticizing the bill as antithetical to India’s federal structure. “One nation, one election, is part of their slogan ‘one leader, one country, one ideology, one language.’ It’s against the federal spirit of the country,” Brittas stated. Highlighting inconsistencies in the government’s approach, he added, “If they were so keen about one election, why did they segregate the election of Maharashtra and Haryana? They could not even hold four elections together.”

Alongside the ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill, the Cabinet approved two additional legislative proposals: a Constitutional amendment to facilitate simultaneous elections and another ordinary Bill aligning elections in Delhi, Puducherry, and Jammu & Kashmir. However, no draft legislation was tabled to align local panchayat and municipal polls with these changes, signaling a phased implementation approach.

The first phase will focus solely on synchronizing national and state elections, a recommendation made by the high-level committee chaired by former President Ram Nath Kovind. Local elections will be considered in subsequent phases.

The Kovind panel had proposed a “one-time transitory measure” for alignment, identifying an “appointed date” as the starting point. State assemblies going to polls after this date would have their terms synchronized with the Lok Sabha to establish a unified electoral cycle. The implementation of these changes raises questions about the terms of recently elected assemblies like those in Haryana, Jharkhand, and Maharashtra.

BJP leaders championed the bill as a step toward improving governance. Sanjay Jaiswal, Chief Whip of the BJP, defended the initiative, said, “Every three months, we have an election, and the efficiency of the government decreases by 50 percent. Even if a particular state is not having elections, senior officials from those states are called for duties in election-bound states. By implementing ‘One Nation, One Election,’ governance can take place peacefully for more than four and a half years.”

Jaiswal further emphasized the historical context, noting, “It was the system until 1971. The idea was coined by our forefathers, the founders of the Constitution, but it got interrupted in the 1970s. We are now going back to the practice we had when the Constitution was first implemented.”

The ‘One Nation, One Election’ Bill has added a fresh dimension to India’s political discourse, with the BJP viewing it as a governance reform and the Opposition decrying it as a centralizing move. As extensive deliberations unfold, both in Parliament and across the country, the proposed legislation will undoubtedly remain a focal point of debate in the months to come.

About Author

SSZee Media

Provider of Quality Entertainment News and Information

See author's posts